Defensive Researches and Management

Defensive Researches and Management

Demystifying the Features of Defense Policies: Stability, Resilience, and Robustness

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammad Taheryan 1
Seyed Abbas Ebrahimi 1
Jafar Zinatbakhsh 2
1 Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
2 Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management & Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
In the contemporary world characterized by increasing complexities, intense dynamics, and profound uncertainties, public policies face unprecedented challenges. This research examines the relationship among three key features “stability,” “resilience,” and “robustness” in defense policies, employing a conceptual review methodology to elucidate these concepts.
The findings reveal distinct characteristics and mechanisms for each concept. Stability focuses on maintaining initial conditions and existing frameworks, operating through process standardization and institutional routines. Resilience emphasizes the capacity for adaptation and recovery after shocks, functioning through organizational learning and rapid feedback systems. Robustness concentrates on maintaining performance despite ambiguity and uncertainty, working through multi-layered design and diversity of tools.
The research results demonstrate that in today’s complex defense environment, an exclusive focus on stability may impede adaptation to environmental changes, while resilience, with its emphasis on returning to previous states, may not adequately address profound challenges. Conversely, robustness, which focuses on maintaining essential functions while allowing flexibility in methods, may provide a more suitable approach for designing defense policies in current complex and variable conditions.
This study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical application in defense policy-making, offering insights for policymakers facing contemporary security challenges. The findings suggest that successful defense policies require a balanced integration of these features, with particular emphasis on robustness as a key characteristic for addressing modern complexities and uncertainties.
Keywords
Defense Policy
Policy Stability
Policy Resilience
Policy Robustness
Policy Design
Subjects
اکبرنژاد، ابوالقاسم؛ و چشک، کریم. (۲۰۲۰). «اولویت‌بندی مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار بر سیاست دفاعی- امنیتی جمهوری اسلامی ایران». مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک، ج 18، ش 80: 189-206.
‫زهدی نسب، یعقوب؛ کمالی، محمدرضا؛ ریاضی، وحید؛ و صادقی، سعید. (۲۰۲۲). «طراحی الگوی ارزیابی تحقق سیاست‎های دفاعی جمهوری اسلامی ایران». مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک، ج 20، ش 89: 94-73.
‫شهرآیینی، اسماعیل؛ و باجلانی، صفدر. (۲۰۲۳). «ویژگی های سیاست‌گذاری مطلوب دفاعی جمهوری اسلامی ایران». مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک، ج 21، ش 93: 191-212.
‫قانعی، رشید؛ و دانایی فرد، حسن. (۲۰۲۰). «واکاوی دلایل موفقیت خط‌مشی‌های دفاعی و هسته‌ای در ایران». مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک، ج 18، ش 82: 119-136.
Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2707-2716.
Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning key concepts for global change policy: Robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 8-21.
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Adaptive Governance in Crisis Management. Public Administration Review, 83(1), 23-36.
Bankes, S. (2016). Robustness, Resilience, and Vulnerability in Complex Social–Ecological Systems. Ecological Economics, 130, 34-41.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2020). The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. University of Chicago Press.
Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2024). The Robustness of Policy Ideas: A New Framework for Analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 52(1), 1-22.
Béland, D.; Howlett, M.; Rocco, P.; & Waddan, A. (2020). Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act. Policy Sciences, 53, 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09368-w.
Bothner, M. S., Smith, E. B., & White, H. C. (2010). A model of robust positions in social networks. American Journal of Sociology, 116(3), 943-992.
Bryant, Corban; Sakamoto, Philemon; Armacost, Andrew; Kolitz, Stephan; Barnhart, Cynthia; & Abramson, Mark. (2011). Robust Mission Planning. Military Operations Research, 5-24.
Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 399-426.
Carstensen, Martin B; & Schmidt, Vivien A. (2024). Ideational robustness of economic ideas in action: the case of European Union economic governance through a decade of crisis. Policy and Society, 43(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae011
Castrejon-Campos, O., Aye, L., & Hui, F. K. P. (2020). Making policy mixes more robust: An integrative and interdisciplinary approach for clean energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 64, 101425.
Clift, Ben. (2024). How “baked in” ideas hinder ideational robustness: the International Monetary Fund and “fiscal space.” Policy and Society, 43(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae021.
Cote, M., & Nightingale, A. J. (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 475-489.
Davidson, D. J. (2010). The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: Some sources of optimism and nagging doubts. Society and Natural Resources, 23(12), 1135-1149.
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., … & Porter, L. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299-333.
Dewulf, A., & Biesbroek, R. (2018). Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: Strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance. Policy and Society, 37(4), 441-458.
Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311-335.
Duit, A., Galaz, V., Eckerberg, K., & Ebbesson, J. (2010). Governance, complexity, and resilience. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 363-368.
Farrell, Theo; & Terriff, Terry. (2002). The sources of military change: Culture, politics, technology. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Feindt, P. H., Proestou, M., & Daedlow, K. (2020). Resilience and policy design in the emerging bioeconomy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 636-652.
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23.
Howlett, M. (2019). Procedural Policy Tools and the Temporal Dimensions of Policy Design: Resilience, Robustness and the Sequencing of Policy Mixes. International Review of Public Policy, 1, 27-45.
Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 33-46.
Howlett, Alexander; Migone, Andrea Riccardo; & Howlett, Michael. (2023). The politics of military procurement: the F-35 purchasing process in Canada and Australia Compared. Defence Studies, 23(2), 292-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2137494
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62.
Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing policies that intentionally stick: Policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 227-247.
Knaggård, Å., & Triantafillou, P. (2024). The ideational robustness of liberal democracy in the wake of the pandemic: Comparing the Danish and Swedish cases. Policy and Society, 43(2), 225-239.
Kwakkel, J. H.; Eker, S.; & Pruyt, E. (2016). How Robust is a Robust Policy? Comparing Alternative Robustness Metrics for Robust Decision-Making. In M. Doumpos, C. Zopounidis, & E. Grigoroudis (Eds.), (M. Doumpos, C. Zopounidis, & E. Grigoroudis, Eds.), Robustness Analysis in Decision Aiding, Optimization, and Analytics (Vol. 241, pp. 221-237). Cham: Springer International Publishing Ag.
Lai, A. Y. H. (2018). Agility amid uncertainties: Evidence from 2009 A/H1N1 pandemics in Singapore and Taiwan. Policy and Society, 37(4), 459-472.
Lempert, Robert J.; Warren, Drake; Henry, Ryan; Button, Robert W.; Klenk, Jonathan; & Giglio, Kate. (2016). Defense resource planning under uncertainty: An application of robust decision making to munitions mix planning. Rand Corporation.
MacInnis, Deborah. (2021). Developing conceptual articles for JCR. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(4), 613-629.
MacKinnon, D., & Derickson, K. D. (2013). From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 253-270.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2020). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. Simon and Schuster.
May, P. J., & Jochim, A. E. (2013). Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426-452.
Migone, A., Howlett, M., & Howlett, A. (2024). Paradigmatic stability, ideational robustness, and policy persistence: Exploring the impact of policy ideas on policy-making. Policy and Society, 43(1), 1-15.
Mortensen, P. B. (2007). Stability and change in public policy: A longitudinal study of comparative subsystem dynamics. Policy Studies Journal, 35(3), 373-394.
Mubarik, M. S., Kashif, M., Shabbir, M., & Jalil, Q. (2024). Sustainable management in natural resources and carbon neutrality: Revisiting the nexus in Ukraine-Russia war context. Resources Policy, 97.
Mukherjee, I., Coban, M. K., & Bali, A. S. (2021). Policy capacities and effective policy design: A review. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 243-268.
Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2016). From robustness to resilience: Avoiding policy traps in the long term. Sustainability Science, 11(6), 909-917.
Neill, Martin; Taliaferro, Aaron C.; Tillman, Mark E.; Morgan, Gary D.; & Hinkle, Wade P. (2017). Defense Policy and Strategy (pp. 1-22). Institute for Defense Analyses. Retrieved from JSTOR.
Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M. H., & Ravinet, P. (2018). Designing for policy effectiveness: Defining and understanding a concept. Cambridge University Press.
Sewerin, S., Fesenfeld, L. P., & Schmidt, T. S. (2023). The role of policy design in policy continuation and ratcheting-up of policy ambition. Policy and Society, 42(4), 478-492.
Stolberg, Alan G. (2012). MAKING NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY IN THE 21ST CENTURY (pp. 41-62). Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College. Retrieved from JSTOR.
Sørensen, E., & Ansell, C. (2021). Towards a concept of political robustness. Political Studies, 69(2), 384-403.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2024). The ideational robustness of bureaucracy. Policy and Society, 43(2), 141-158.
Tagarev, Todor. (2006). The Art of Shaping Defense Policy. Connections, 5(1), 15-34. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26323227
Van der Steen, M.; & van Twist, M. (2018). Strategies for robustness: Five perspectives on how policy design is done. Policy and Society, 37, 491-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1520782
Walker, B., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Gunderson, L., Peterson, G. D., Scheffer, M., … & Westley, F. R. (2013). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 5.
Wee, Bert Van; & Banister, David. (2016). How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278-288.
Wilson, C. A. (2019). Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 883-905.
Workman, M., Darch, G., Denisart, B., Roberts, D., Wilkes, M., Brown, S., & Kruitwagen, L. (2024). A robust decision-making approach in climate policy design for possible net zero futures. Environmental Science & Policy, 162, 1-6.

  • Receive Date 30 January 2025
  • Revise Date 11 May 2025
  • Accept Date 19 April 2025