تحلیل اقدام نظامی جمهوری آذربایجان در قبال مسئله نوگورنو قره‌باغ و جمهوری آرتساخ، و همچنین بررسی اجمالی مواضع جمهوری اسلامی ایران (جنگ سپتامبر 2020)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 نویسنده مسئول: کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

4 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران

چکیده

با وجود استقلال دولت‌های محلی قفقاز جنوبی و مناطق تحت کنترل آن‌ها از قواعد حاکمیتی اتحاد جماهیر شوروی با آغاز دهه 90 میلادی، همچنان به مسئله قره‌باغ به مانند آتش زیر خاکستر نگاه می‌شود. نیز با وصف اینکه این آشفتگی ژئوپلیتیک و سیاسی از یک موضوع صرفاً داخلی در حوزه مرزهای شوروی به رویدادی منطقه‌ای بدل شده است، اما نه تنها فرصت و راه‌حل تازه‌ای پیش روی جمهوری آذربایجان و ارمنستان قرار نگرفته که به تعمیق بحران و پیچیده‌تر شدن تنش با ورود جدی‌تر بازیگران منطقه‌ای و بین‌المللی، انجامیده است تا جایی که در ادامه سلسله درگیری‌های نظامی دیرین در قره‌باغ، چهارمین نبرد هم در این منطقه که به مراتب وسیع‌تر و دارای تبعات بیشتر بود، شکل گرفت. انگیزه‌ها و دلایل متنوعی وجود دارد که پیش‌زمینه و انگیزه لازم برای گسترش و ضریب‌دهی به درگیری‌های سپتامبر 2020 در قره‌باغ را از سوی جمهوری آذربایجان فراهم آورد که در این مقاله تلاش داریم با تکیه بر آرای واقع‌گرایی تهاجمی و مؤلفه‌ها و منابع موجود، همچنین با بررسی اجمالی رویکرد جمهوری اسلامی ایران در  قره‌باغ، آن‌ها را واکاوی کنیم.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of the Military Action of the Republic of Azerbaijan on the Issue of Nagorno-Karabakh and the Republic of Artsakh, as well as an Overview of the Positions of the Islamic Republic of Iran (September 2020 War)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sobhan Mohammadi 1
  • Abumohammad Asgarkhani 2
  • Mohammad Bagher Mokaremi Pour 3
  • Saleh Veysi 4
1 Corresponding Author: Master, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of International Ties, College of Law and Political Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
3 PH.D Candidate in Political Sciences, Shahed University, Iran
4 MA, Imam Hossein University, Iran
چکیده [English]

Despite the independence of the local governments of the Southern Caucasus and the regions under their control from the rules of governance of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the Nagorno-Karabakh issue is still seen as a fire under the ashes, despite the geopolitical and political turmoil of a mere issue. Internal conflict in the Soviet border region has become a regional event, not only there is no new opportunity and solution for the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia, but also the deepening of the crisis and the escalation of tensions with the more serious involvement of regional actors and International achieved as the consequences. As a result of a series of long-standing military conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh, the fourth battle took place in the region, which was far more extensive and had more consequences. There are various motives and reasons that provided the necessary background and motivation for the expansion and multiplication of the September 2020 conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh by the Republic of Azerbaijan, and in the forthcoming article we have tried to rely on the views of Offensive realism and component and available sources, as well as an overview of the Islamic Republic of Iran's approach to Nagorno-Karabakh, to analyze them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Southern Caucasus
  • Nagorno-Karabakh
  • Republic of Azerbaijan
  • Armenia
  • Offensive Realism

Smiley face

مراجع

  1. منابع:

    الف) فارسی

    1. امیراحمدی، بهرام (1373)، «قره‌باغ: از دیرباز تا کنون، بررسی رویدادها»، فصلنامه مطالعات آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، سال دوم، شماره 4، ص 291.
    2. اندرو، کوریبکو ( 2015)، «جنگ‌های ترکیبی»، سبحان محمدی. تهران: نشر آرون.
    3. بیات، عیوض ( 1390)، « سیاست خارجی روسیه و ترکیه در قبال مناقشه قره‌باغ»، تهران: اندیشه نو.
    4. پور احمدی میبدی، حسین و محمد، پدین (1398)، «عوامل تأثیر گذار بر روابط ج.ا.ایران و ج.آذربایجان از سال 1992 تا 2016»، فصلنامه رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، سال یازدهم، شماره 3، ص 7-8.
    5. زارع شاهمرسی، پرویز ( 1382)، «جغرافیای سیاسی قره‌باغ»، اویرنجی (نشریه دانشجویان آذربایجانی دانشگاه امیرکبیر)، سال چهارم، شماره 15، ص 30.
    6. غفاری، امید، ویسی نژاد، امید علی، و محمد تقی‌پور (1391)، «مناقشه قره‌باغ و تأثیر آن بر امنیت ملی ج.ا.ایران»، فصلنامه پژوهشی امنیت پژوهی، سال یازدهم، شماره39، ص11-12.
    7. «نقش‌آفرینی ایران در دوگانه آذربایجان و ارمنستان» (1398)، اندیشکده راهبردی تبیین، ص 14.

    ب) لاتین

    1. Abbasov, Shahin (2011), Azerbaijan-Turkey Military Pact Signals Impatience with Minsk Talks – Analysts, eurasianet, > https://eurasianet.org/azerbaijan-turkey-military-pact-signals-impatience-with-minsk-talks-analysts <, (accessed 11 dec 2020).
    2. Armenian Assembly of America )2018( »Republic of Artsakh (formely known as the Nagorno Karabakh Republic)«, p. 2.
    3. Asatryan, Vahan, Murman, Margvelashvili, Jeyhun, Veliyev (2015) » Energy security in the South Caucasus: views from the region« , FRIED, p.5-8.
    4. Askerov, Ali (2020), » The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict The Beginning of the Soviet End «, EBSCO Publishing, p. 4.
    5. Avdeev, Alexandre (2015) » POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS: Beyond the Demographic Transition in Azerbaijan «, UNFPA/UNDP, p. 32.
    6. Azerbaijan Information Digest (2007) »Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaija« , PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY, p. 3.
    7. Azimzade, Aynur (2019), » Armenia plundering natural resources in occupied Azerbaijani territories«, irs history, volume 1, issue 38, p. 4.
    8. Base Metals(2020), History of Base Metals, Companies of Vallex Group Republic of Armenia>https://web.archive.org/web/20120418113129/http://www.bm.am/en/about/history.htm <, (accessed 1 dec 2020).
    9. Bentzen, Naja And Miro Guzzini (2020), » Azerbaijan ahead of the parliamentary election «,European Parliamentary Research Service , volume 646.165, p. 1.
    10. Bowden, Julian (2020), »Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict: energy implications of a potential escalation« , The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, p. 3.
    11. Brief History Of Artsakh(Nagorno-Karabakh) )2013(, MIA publishres, p. 13-15.
    12. Charles, Robia (2010), » Religiosity in Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan« , CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST, volume 20, p. 3.
    13. Cornell, Svante E, Fariz, Ismailzade,Tamara, Makarenko, Khatuna,Salukvadze,Georgi, Tcheishvili (2002), » The South Caucasus: A Regional and Conflict Assessment« , SIDA, p. 49.
    14. Country Analysis Executive Summary: Azerbaijan (2019) » U.S. Energy Information Administration« , p. 2.
    15. Ergun, Ayça & Anar, Valiyev (2020),» An Account on Karabakh War: Why Now and Then What?«, Panorama, E-publication, p. 9.
    16. Ergun, Ayça (2010), » Post-Soviet Political Transformation in Azerbaijan: Political Elite, Civil Society and the Trials of Democratization« , Uluslararası İlişkiler, volume 7, issue 26, p. 18.
    17. FATİH ÖZTARSU (2011), » Military Relations of Turkey and Azerbaijan«, Strategic Outlook, volume 1, issue 2, p. 2.
    18. Georgia Population (2020), Population of Georgia, Worldometer > https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/georgia-population/ <, (accessed 20 nov 2020).
    19. Guardian (2020), Syrian recruit describes role of foreign fighters in Nagorno-Karabakh. The Guardian, >https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/02/syrian-recruit-describes-role-of-foreign-fighters-in-nagorno-karabakh <, (accessed 6 dec 2020).
    20. Gul YESEVI, Cagla And Burcu Yavuz, TIFTIKCIGIL (2015), » Turkey-Azerbaijan Energy Relations: A Political and Economic Analysis«, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, volume 5, issue 1, p. 4.
    21. Guliyev, Farid (2012), » Political elites in Azerbaijan. Domestic Elites and Policy-Making« , p.4.
    22. Isachenko, Daria (2020), » Turkey–Russia Partnership in the War over Nagorno-Karabakh« , SWP (Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs), volume 53, p. 1.
    23. Ismailzade, Fariz (2006) »TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN: THE HONEYMOON IS OVER«, Turkish Policy Quarterly, p. 4.
    24. Jödicke, Ansgar And Kornely Kakachia (2017), » RELIGION AND SOFT POWER IN SOUTH CAUCASUS«, Georgian Institute of Politics, p. 6.
    25. Johnson, Dominic D. P. And Thayer, Bradley A (2016), »The evolution of offensive realism Survival under anarchy from the Pleistocene to the present« , Politics and the Life Sciences, volume 35, issue 1, p. 1.
    26. Jung Kim, Dong (2020), » A Case for Geoeconomic Restraint: Offensive Realism and the Inflated Threat of Chinese Economic Initiatives«, GEOPOLITICS, p. 5-6.
    27. Kaleji, Vali (2020), » THE 2020 NAGORNOKARABAKH CONFLICT FROM IRAN’S PERSPECTIVE«, Center for Strategic Studies (CSS), p. 9.
    28. Karabakg (2020), Department of Economic and Social Geography of BSU, Karabakg.org. >https://karabakh.org/conflict/occupied-territories/the-potential-of-natural-resources-in-the-occupied-territories/ <, (accessed 1 dec 2020).
    29. Kirshner, Jonathan (2010),» The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China«, European Journal of International Relations, volume 18, issue 1, p. 8.
    30. Klever, Emma (2013), »The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan: An overview of the current situation« , European Movement, p. 4.
    31. Kseniia Faikivna, Pashaieva (2019), » Energy resources of the South Caucasus Region: the political and security dimension«, POLITICUS SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL: 1-2.
    32. Lindenstrauss, Gallia (2015) » Nagorno-Karabakh: The Frozen Confict Awakens« , Strategic Assessment, volume 18, issue 1, p. 3.
    33. Lindenstrauss, Gallia (2015) »Israel-Azerbaijan: Despite the Constraints, a Special Relationship«, Strategic Assessment, volume 17, issue 4, p. 3.
    34. Matveeva, Anna (2002), » The South Caucasus: Nationalism, Conflict and Minorities« , Minority Rights Group International, p. 7.
    35. Maya, Ehrmann, Josef, Kraus, And Emil, Souleimanov (2013), »The Iran-Israel-Azerbaijan Triangle: Implications on Regional Security«, REVISTA ESTUDOS POLÍTICOS, volume 6. P. 10-11.
    36. Minority Rights Group International (2015),World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples - Nagorny Karabakh (unrecognised state), refworld > https://www.refworld.org/docid/4954ce4b23.html <, (accessed 1 December 2020).
    37. Nuri Aras, Osman, Suleymanov, Elchin And Karim, Mammadov (2016) » ECONOMY OF AZERBAIJAN 25 Years of Independence« , Sharg-Garb Publishing House, p. 39.
    38. O'Neill, Aaron (2021), Azerbaijan: Ratio of military spending to gross domestic product (GDP) from 2009 to 2019, Statista, > https://www.statista.com/statistics/810328/ratio-of-military-expenditure-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp-azerbaijan/ <, (accessed 10 dec 2020).
    39. Rácz, András ( 2020), »War in Nagorno- Karabakh A Two-Track Strategy for the EU«, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V. volume 30, p. 3.
    40. Rehimov, Ruslan (2020), Presence of PKK terrorists in Upper Karabakh revealed, Anadolu Agency, > https://www.aa.com.tr/en/azerbaijan-front-line/presence-of-pkk-terrorists-in-upper-karabakh-revealed/2017495 <, (accessed 11 dec 2020).
    41. Russell, Martin (2020), »Armenia and Azerbaijan on the brink of war. EPRS European« , Parliamentary Research Service, volume PE 659.267, p. 2.
    42. Shanmugasundaram, Sasikumar (2012), » Regional hegemony and emerging powers«, CEU Etd Collection, p. 18.
    43. snyder, Glenn H (2001), » Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security. International Security«, volume 27, issue 1, p. 9-10.
    44. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (2020), Syrian rebel fighters prepare to deploy to Azerbaijan in sign of Turkey’s ambition, SOHR, > https://www.syriahr.com/en/186036/ < (accessed 6 dec 2020).
    45. Toft, Peter ( 2005), »John J. Mearsheimer: an offensive realist between geopolitics and power«, Journal of International Relations and Development, volume 8, issue 4, p. 4.
    46. Towards a Fair and Just Resolution of the Mountainous Karabakh Conflict (2011), » The European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy (EAFJD): p. 4.
    47. Valeriano, Brandon (2009), » The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Testing Aggressive Power Politics Model« , International Interactions, volume 35, issue 2, p. 6.
    48. Verdiyeva, Nailya (2019), »How the population of the Republic of Azerbaijan is ageing: causes and potential for social and economic development« ,Population and Economics, volume 3, issue 3, p. 5.
    49. »Decent Work Country Programme of Republic Of Azerbaijan For 2016-2020« (2016), International Labour Organization, p. 3.
    50. »EDUCATION, TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENTS 2018« (2019), European Training Foundation, p. 4.
    51. »Military expenditure by country, in constant (2018) US$ m., 1988-2019« (2020), SIPRI, p. 20.
    52. »Rating-Agentur Expert RA GmbH« (2020), Research Report on Azerbaijan, p. 2.
    53. »Sustainable Development Of Energy In Azerbaijan: Gaps In Energy Efficiency And Ways To Eliminate Them« (2018), UNECE, p. 7.
    54. »Sustainable Infrastructure Development for a Low-Carbon Transition in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Mapping of Potentially High-impact Infrastructure Projects and Needs Assessment, Strategic Infrastructure Planning for Sustainable Development in Azerbaijan« ( 2019), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD), p. 2.
    55. »The Azerbaijani economy in the first half of 2019: Brief Overview« (2019), Center for Economic and Social Development (CESD), p. 2.
    56. »Events 2020«(2020), > https://raexpert.eu/events2020/ <, (accessed 10 dec 2020).
    57. »Global Firepower 2020: Most powerful military nations of the world«. (2020), > https://www.globalfirepower.com/ <, (accessed 10 dec 2020).
    58. »Nogorno-karabakh demographic information«, (2020). > ethno-kavkaz.narod.ru < , (accessed 1 December 2020).

    »The World Bank Group, State Statistic Committee of Azerbaijan Republic and 

مدیریت و پژوهش‌های دفاعی
دوره 20، شماره 92 - شماره پیاپی 92
فصلنامه تابستان
شهریور 1400
صفحه 155-187

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 29 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 14 آذر 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار