مبانی حقوقی محارست از توانمندی دفاعی حماس در جنگ مسلحانه با رژیم صهیونیستی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 نویسنده مسئول: استاد تمام، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد حقوق بین‌الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

نبرد 11 روزه شمشیر قدس در حالی به پایان رسید که نظامیان حماس با وجود محاصره و نظارت شدید رژیم صهیونیستی بر نوار غزه، بیش از 3000 موشک در بردهای مختلف به سمت سرزمین‌های اشغالی شلیک کردند و علی‌رغم تلاش چندین ساله صهیونیست در خلع سلاح کامل حماس و نوار غزه، در نهایت به پیروزی جبهه مقاومت انجامید. راز این ظفر در به‌کارگیری ایده‌ خلاقانه و منحصربه‌فردی به نام تونل‌ نظامی بود که منجر به تغییر محاسبات جهانی شد. تونل‌های نظامی صرفاً بخشی از توانمندی‌های مبتکرانه جبهه مقاومت در مواجهه با اشغالگران رژیم صهیونیستی بوده است که آسیب‌پذیری این رژیم را بیش از هر زمان دیگر به رخ کشانده است. این سازه‌ به عنوان یک مخفیگاه باارزش و غیرقابل رصد، امکان کسب اطلاعات را به حداقل می‌رساند و محاسبات دشمن را تا حد زیادی تحت‌الشعاع قرار می‌دهد تا جایی که در موسم جنگ، مزیت آن دوچندان شده و طرف‌‌های فاقد تجهیزات، قلت قوای خود را با حفر تونل‌های نظامی توازن می‌بخشند تا بر رجحان تسلیحاتی طرف‌ مقابل فائق آیند.
اهمیت و ضرورت این تحقیق از آنجایی است که علی‌رغم استفاده مکرر از تونل‌های نظامی در عرصه مخاصمات، تاکنون موضوع هیچ یک از قوانین حقوق مخاصمات مسلحانه قرار نگرفته‌اند و چگونگی وضعیت حقوقی آنان در نزد جامعه بین‌المللی سؤال‌برانگیز باقی مانده است. سؤال اصلی تحقیق بررسی وضعیت حقوقی ساخت و کاربرد این تأسیسات در جنگ مسلحانه نظامیان حماس با رژیم صهیونیستی می‌باشد. فرضیه تحقیق آن است که مشروعیت کاربرد تونل‌های نظامی در گرو ساختارمندی روش و شیوه به‌کارگیری آن در میادین نبرد است که خود مبین ماهیت قانونی این جنگ‌افزار می‌باشد. این مقاله با روش تحقیق  توصیفی تحلیلی پاسخ به پرسش فوق را در نهایت با تسجیل مشروعیت ساخت و کاربرد این جنگ‌افزار برآورده می‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Legal bases for defending Hamas' defense capability in the armed conflict with the Zionist entity

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Fazlollah Mousavi 1
  • Amir Lohrasbi 2
1 Corresponding Author:Full Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Tehran University , Tehran, Iran
2 MA in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The 11-day Battle of the Quds sword ended while Hamas's military militants shot more than 3,000 missiles on the Gaza Strip, and despite the old Zionist attempt in full disarmament of Hamas and Gaza Strip eventually led to the victory of the resistance front. The secret of this Zafar was in using a creative and unique idea called a military tunnel, which led to changing global calculations. Military tunnels were merely part of the innovative capabilities of the resistance front in the face of the Zionist regime occupation, which occurred more vulnerability of this regime than any other time. This structure, as a valuable and unpreceded hide, minimizes the ability to obtain information, and extends the enemy calculations to a large extent, so that the advantage of the war, its advantage and equipment lacking equipment, drilled their bills. Military tunnels balances to overcome the opponents of the opponents. The importance and necessity of this research is since in spite of repeated use of military tunnels in the arena of conflict, so far, none of the laws of the rights of armed conflicts have been placed, and how their legal status is left to the international community. The main question of research is to investigate the legal status and the application of these facilities in the armed war of Hamas with the Zionist regime. The research hypothesis is that the legitimacy of the use of military tunnels depends on the construction of the methodology and method of using it in the battlefields, which itself represents the legal nature of this weapons. This paper examines the answer to the above question with the descriptive-analytic research method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Military Tunnel
  • Resistance Front
  • Asymmetric Warfare
  • 11-Day Warfare
  • Rights of Armed Conflicts
  • Hamas

Smiley face

مراجع

  1. فارسی

    • کولب، روبرت (1394). درآمدی بر حقوق مخاصمات مسلحانه، ترجمه سیدحسام‌الدین لسانی، انتشارات مجد.

    ب- انگلیسی

    1. A) Books
    • Arkin, William (2007). Divining Victory: Airpower in the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War, Air University Press.
    • Cheng, Bin (1998). Studies in International Space Law, Clarendon Press.
    • de Waart, Paul (1994). Dynamics of Self-Determination in Palestine: Protection of Peoples as a Human Right (Social, Economic and Political Studies of the Middle East and Asia), Brill.
    • Gardam, Judith (2004). Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States, Cambridge University Press.
    • Lauterpacht, Hersch (2004). International Law: Disputes, War and Neutrality (Volume 5, Parts IX-XIV), Cambridge University Press.
    • Morcan, James & Morcan, Lance (2015). UNDERGROUND BASES: Subterranean Military Facilities and the Cities Beneath Our Feet, Sterling Gate Books.
    • Richemond-Barak, Daphné (2018). Underground Warfare, Oxford University Press.
    • Said, Edward W. (2015). The Question of Palestine, Vintage.
    • Schindler, Dietrich (2004). The Laws of Armed Conflicts: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions and Other Documents, Brill – Nijhoff.
    1. B) Articles
    • Elias, Olufemi (2006). "Persistent Objector", Oxford Public International Law(OPIL), Retrieved from:  https://opil.ouplaw.com/ view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1455?rsk ey=bW4XnM&result=1&prd=OPIL.
    • Fry, James D. (2006). “Contextualized legal reviews for the methods and means of warfare: Cave combat and international humanitarian law”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 44, Issue 2, pp. 453-519.
    • Kober, Avi (2008). “The Israel defense forces in the Second Lebanon War: Why the Poor Performance?” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 3-40.
    • Maogoto, Jackson & Freeland, Steven (2007). “The Final Frontier: The Laws of Armed Conflict and Space Warfare”, Connecticut Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 165-196.
    • Morgan, Richard A. (1994). “Military Use of Commercial Communication Satellites: A New Look at the Outer Space Treaty and Peaceful Purposes”, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Vol. 60, Issue 1, pp. 237-328.
    • Pahlavi, Pierre & Ouellet, Eric (2012). “Institutional Analysis and Irregular Warfare: Israel Defense Forces during the 33-Day War of 2006,” Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 32-55.
    • Tannenwald, Nina (2004). “Law versus Power on the High Frontier: The Case for a Rule-Based Regime for Outer Space”, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 363-422.
    • Watkins, Nicole J. & James, Alena M. (2016). “Digging Into Israel: The Sophisticated Tunneling Network of Hamas”, Journal of Strategic Security, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 84-103.
    1. C) Documents
    • Human Rights Council Report (24 June 2015). Report of the detailed findings of the independent commission of inquiry established pursuant to Human Rights Council Resolution S-21/1, A/HRC/29/CRP.4.
    • Human Rights Watch Report (17 October 2004). Razing Rafah: Mass Demolitions in the Gaza Strip, Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2004/10/17/razing-rafah/mass-home-demolitions-gaza-strip.
    • ICJ Reports (9 July 2004). Advisory Opinion Concerning Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
    • ICJ Reports (8 July 1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion).
    • International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Convention on Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention), 7 December 1944, Entry into force: 4 April 1947.
    • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Statement of Ms. Navanethem Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to the Ninth Special Session of the Human Rights Council on The Grave Violations of Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory including the recent aggression of the occupied Gaza Strip, 9 January 2009, Available at: https://newsarchive.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=9291&LangID=E.
    • UN General Assembly Declaration (24 October 1970). Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, A/RES/2625(XXV).
    • UN General Assembly Resolution (12 December 1973). Basic principles of the legal status of the combatants struggling against colonial and alien domination and racist régimes, A/RES/3103.
    • UN General Assembly Resolution (14 December 1974). Definition of Aggression, A/RES/3314.
    • UN General Assembly Resolution (29 July 1980). Question of Palestine, A/RES/ES-7/2.
    • UN General Assembly, Convention on the Law of the Sea, 10 December 1982, Entry into force: 16 November 1994.
    • UN General Assembly, Treaty on Principle Governing the Activities of States in The Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, 27 January 1967, Entry into force: 10 October 1967.
    • UN Human Rights Council Resolution (24 July 2014). Ensuring respect for international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, A/HRC/RES/S-21/1.
    • United Nations Human Rights Council Report (24 June 2015). Report of the detailed findings of the independent commission of inquiry established pursuant to Human Rights Council Resolution S-21/1, A/HRC/29/CRP.4.
    • United Nations Human Rights Council (27 February 2009). Human Rights situation in Palestine and other Arab territories, A/ HRC/10/NGO/101.
    • United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) (9 November 2017). Protection of Civilians Report, Available at: https://www.ochaopt.org/content/protection-civilians-report-24-october-6-november-2017.
    1. D) Sites
مدیریت و پژوهش‌های دفاعی
دوره 20، شماره 93
فصلنامه پاییز
آذر 1400
صفحه 31-53

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 01 شهریور 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 25 آبان 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 28 آذر 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار